Feedback
What you did not ask for, but should hear
Feedback that arrives unsolicited, in comments, in reactions, in offhand remarks, is often the most accurate signal you will get, and the least likely to be saved.
There is a category of feedback that is more valuable than any formal review: the thing someone says when they are not trying to be diplomatic. The annotation in a shared doc. The Slack message after a presentation. The comment in a team retro that captures what everyone was thinking. This feedback is candid, specific, and time-stamped to the moment it was most relevant. It is also almost never systematically captured.
The challenge with informal feedback is that it arrives across many surfaces and often in passing. A manager says something in a one-to-one that changes how you approach a project. A colleague annotates a draft in a way that reveals a fundamental misunderstanding. A client mentions something in a call that suggests the brief was off. Each of these is a signal, and each is likely to exist only in the memory of the person who received it.
For an AI tool to give useful feedback on your work, or to help you improve over time, it needs access to the patterns in feedback you have already received. What recurring themes have come up. What has been consistently praised or consistently flagged. This is a layer of context that most tools have no way to reach today.
